Starnes v. Interstate Foam Supply

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJune 9, 2003
DocketI.C. NO. 801639
StatusPublished

This text of Starnes v. Interstate Foam Supply (Starnes v. Interstate Foam Supply) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Starnes v. Interstate Foam Supply, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2003).

Opinion

***********
Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence modifies and affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner.

***********
MOTIONS
The issues raised in plaintiff's Motion to Compel, filed on 16 January 2002, are ruled upon in this Opinion and Award in accordance with the applicable law.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties in their Pre-Trial Agreement and at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. The Industrial Commission has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this case, the parties are properly before the Commission, and the parties were subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act at all relevant times.

2. Defendant was a duly qualified self-insured, with Key Risk Management Services as the servicing agent.

3. The employee-employer relationship existed between the parties at all relevant times.

4. Plaintiff sustained an admittedly compensable injury on 17 January 1997, as a result of which defendant filed a Form 63 with the Commission. Defendant paid temporary total disability benefits to plaintiff from 7 January 1998 through 3 March 1999.

5. Plaintiff's average weekly wage was $370.00, which yields a compensation rate of $246.68 per week.

6. The parties stipulated to the medical records of Dr. Alfred Geissele, Dr. Robert Hart, Dr. Bruce Hilton, Dr. Maurice Horton, Dr. Bruce Schmitt, Dr. Richard Young, Dr. Robert Allen, Dr. Mark Rodger, Dr. Toni Harris, Dr. Susan Torres, Dr. Hans Hansen, Sampson Regional Medical Center, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Pro-Active Therapy, Frye Regional Medical Center, Catawba Memorial Hospital, HealthSouth Rehab, Dr. Agapito Fajardo, National Diagnostics, Inc, and Berkley Care Network.

***********
Based upon all of the competent evidence adduced from the record and the reasonable inferences therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, plaintiff was 50 years old. She had worked as a hairdresser, at a cotton mill, at a cardboard box plant, and as a sewer at two furniture plants. Plaintiff began working for defendant-employer in their Hickory, North Carolina plant, as a furniture cover sewer, where her duties included dragging 50 pound packages from the truck, sewing and turning the cushion covers, stuffing the covers with foam, operating a sewing machine, standing, and walking to move product in and out of her work area.

2. On 17 January 1997 at approximately 5:00 p.m., plaintiff was reporting to work when she slipped on ice in the parking lot. She landed on her tailbone, jammed her right arm, cut her right hand, and hurt her neck and low back. Plaintiff also had pain radiating into her right leg. She timely reported the injury to her employer.

3. Defendant-employer referred plaintiff to Dr. Robert W. Hart, III, for complaints of neck pain and of low back pain, which radiated into her right leg. Plaintiff did not report any pain in her right shoulder or right shoulder blade at this time, nor did she indicate that she had pain radiating down her right arm. An x-ray was taken of plaintiff's lower back, but not of her cervical spine. The x-ray showed degenerative disk disease at L4-5 and L5-S1. Dr. Hart diagnosed plaintiff with acute low back strain, mild cervical strain, and a contusion to the right palm. Plaintiff was provided with medication and returned to work. She was placed on light duty with no lifting, bending or twisting. Dr. Hart released plaintiff from his treatment on 25 February 1997, and he referred plaintiff to Bruce A. Hilton, D.C., for chiropractic treatment.

4. Plaintiff left her job with defendant-employer in May 1997, after she married and moved to Wilmington, North Carolina.

5. Once in Wilmington, plaintiff continued to take the medication prescribed by Dr. Hart. Gradually, plaintiff's left leg symptoms and low back and right hip pain increased and she sought chiropractic adjustments on her own, starting on 22 August 1997. Plaintiff continued chiropractic treatment through September 1997, with some improvement in her condition.

6. Plaintiff worked part-time for Whisper Knits in Clinton, North Carolina, from 20 October 1997 to 8 November 1997. Her duties involved sewing shirts, which were substantially easier than the sewing she performed for defendant. Plaintiff never worked full time for Whisper Knits due to their workload. She terminated her employment after her neck and arm pain increased.

7. On 25 November 1997, defendant authorized plaintiff to receive treatment with Dr. Richard C. Young of Clinton Orthopaedic Clinic. Dr. Young found plaintiff to have discogenic disease of the lumbar and cervical spine, possibly aggravated by her fall in January 1997.

8. On 15 December 1997, defendant referred plaintiff to Dr. Robert L. Allen of Raleigh Neurosurgical Clinic for an evaluation of her neck and low back. Dr. Allen found plaintiff's low back condition was due to degenerative lumbar disc disease. Physical therapy was recommended, and although Dr. Allen opined that plaintiff should continue working, he noted that some modifications in her job duties may be necessary.

9. Rehabilitation Nurse Frances Nichols referred plaintiff for treatment at Coastal Orthopaedics in Wilmington, North Carolina, where Dr. R. Mark Rodger saw her on 19 February 1998. Dr. Rodger diagnosed plaintiff with degenerative disc disease of the lumbar and cervical spine, and he treated these conditions until 30 October 1998. He also referred plaintiff to Dr. Toni Harris for pain management treatment on 1 May 1998. Dr. Rodger did not consider plaintiff to be a candidate for surgery at the time he ended his treatment on 30 October 1998. He reported that plaintiff had reached maximum medical improvement and assigned a 5% permanent partial disability rating to plaintiff's spine.

10. On 8 December 1998, Dr. Rodger reviewed and approved a job description for a sedentary position as a sewer with defendant at the Hickory plant. Plaintiff did not return to the approved job because she had moved from the Hickory area and had been living in the Wilmington area since May 1997. The Full Commission finds that because of the distance plaintiff lived from the proposed employment, plaintiff's refusal of the position was justified.

11. In late December 1998 or January 1999, plaintiff moved to Statesville, North Carolina, and on 18 January 1999, defendant filed a Form 24 Application to Terminate or Suspend Payment of Compensation with the Industrial Commission on grounds that plaintiff had refused suitable employment. Following a telephonic hearing before a Special Deputy Commissioner, defendant was authorized to suspend payment of compensation to plaintiff from 8 December 1998 until plaintiff ceased to refuse the work tendered by defendant or until plaintiff could show the refusal to be justified. Although defendant relied on the sedentary job which the rehabilitation nurse took to Dr. Rodger as a basis for the Form 24 Application, the job was never formally offered to plaintiff after she moved from the Wilmington area to Statesville. Therefore, the Form 24 was improvidently approved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Childress v. Trion, Inc.
481 S.E.2d 697 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Starnes v. Interstate Foam Supply, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starnes-v-interstate-foam-supply-ncworkcompcom-2003.