Starlite Merchandise Co. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 871
United States Customs Court·Decided July 1, 1967·No. No. P67/248·Published

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of.earphones similar in all material respects to those the subject of Motorola, Inc., and International Expediters, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 303, Abstract 69019), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of earphones which are not suitable for controlling, distributing, modifying, producing, or rectifying electrical energy and that said merchandise, in fact, consists of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, wholly or in chief value of metal, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Starlite Merchandise Co. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 871 (cusc 1967).

59 Cust. Ct. 871 (Starlite Merchandise Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Motorola, Inc. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 303 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)