Starlite Acupuncture, P.C. v. MVAIC
Opinion
against
MVAIC, Appellant.
Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (Barbara Carabell of counsel), for appellant. The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin S. Garson, J.), entered July 8, 2016. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
For the reasons stated in Starlite Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Torres, Yamil v MVAIC (___ Misc 3d ___, 2019 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2016-3006 K C], decided herewith), the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.
PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: August 02, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Starlite Acupuncture, P.C. v. MVAIC (Starlite Acupuncture, P.C. v. MVAIC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.