Starling v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Starling v. Harris

151 S.E.2d 163, 114 Ga. App. 282, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 719

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 7, 1966

Docket42179

StatusPublished

This text of 151 S.E.2d 163 (Starling v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Starling v. Harris, 151 S.E.2d 163, 114 Ga. App. 282, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 719 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Jordan, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court of May 5, 1966, continuing in effect until further order of court a stay in proceedings previously granted by order of August 25, 1965, upon application of the defendant under the Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act (50 USCA, § 521). Held:

The record in this case discloses that the original stay was granted upon the verified application of the defendant showing among other things that he was a member of the United States Army stationed in Korea, that he could not obtain leave to attend court, and that his presence was essential to a proper defense to this action in tort arising out of an automobile collision to which there were no eyewitnesses other than the parties and to which action the defendant claimed a good defense; and there being no evidence produced on the subsequent hearing to show any change in circumstances of the defendant, it cannot be said that the trial court abused its discretion in continuing the stay until further order of court even though the original application contained the statement that the defendant “expects to be available in March, 1966 to defend this case.” Cox v. Yates, 96 Ga. App. 466 (100 SE2d 649); Parker v. Parker, 207 Ga. 588 (2) (63 SE2d 366); Gates v. Gates, 197 Ga. 11 (2) (28 SE2d 108); Boone v. Lightner, 319 U. S. 561 (63 SC 1223, 87 LE 1587).

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jordan, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court of May 5, 1966, continuing in effect until further order of court a stay in proceedings previously granted by order of August 25, 1965, upon application of the defendant under the Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act (50 USCA, § 521). Held:

The record in this case discloses that the original stay was granted upon the verified application of the defendant showing among other things that he was a member of the United States Army stationed in Korea, that he could not obtain leave to attend court, and that his presence was essential to a proper defense to this action in tort arising out of an automobile collision to which there were no eyewitnesses other than the parties and to which action the defendant claimed a good defense; and there being no evidence produced on the subsequent hearing to show any change in circumstances of the defendant, it cannot be said that the trial court abused its discretion in continuing the stay until further order of court even though the original application contained the statement that the defendant “expects to be available in March, 1966 to defend this case.” Cox v. Yates, 96 Ga. App. 466 (100 SE2d 649); Parker v. Parker, 207 Ga. 588 (2) (63 SE2d 366); Gates v. Gates, 197 Ga. 11 (2) (28 SE2d 108); Boone v. Lightner, 319 U. S. 561 (63 SC 1223, 87 LE 1587).

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 S.E.2d 163, 114 Ga. App. 282, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starling-v-harris-gactapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack