Starkweather v. Wing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Starkweather v. Wing

242 A.D.2d 961, 662 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10581

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 242 A.D.2d 961 (Starkweather v. Wing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Starkweather v. Wing, 242 A.D.2d 961, 662 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination unanimously annulled on the law without costs and petition granted. Memorandum: Petitioner’s infant is a 14-year-old boy who is completely wheelchair dependent and without the strength to propel a manual wheelchair because of cerebral palsy, spastic quadriplegia and other ailments. He lives with his 60-year-old grandparents, who have a history of back problems, in a mobile [962]*962home that has been renovated to accommodate his needs. He has no personal care aides and is totally reliant upon his grandparents when not at school. Petitioner presented medical proof establishing that a specially adapted power wheelchair is needed to increase the independence and functional ability of petitioner’s infant, especially in emergency situations, and to prevent the development of “learned helplessness”. Because respondent did not offer any contrary proof, the determination that a customized power wheelchair is not medically necessary is not supported by substantial evidence (see, Social Services Law § 365-a; Matter of Gartz v Wing, 236 AD2d 890; Matter of Dobson v Perales, 175 AD2d 628). We therefore annul the determination and grant the petition. (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination unanimously annulled on the law without costs and petition granted. Memorandum: Petitioner’s infant is a 14-year-old boy who is completely wheelchair dependent and without the strength to propel a manual wheelchair because of cerebral palsy, spastic quadriplegia and other ailments. He lives with his 60-year-old grandparents, who have a history of back problems, in a mobile [962]*962home that has been renovated to accommodate his needs. He has no personal care aides and is totally reliant upon his grandparents when not at school. Petitioner presented medical proof establishing that a specially adapted power wheelchair is needed to increase the independence and functional ability of petitioner’s infant, especially in emergency situations, and to prevent the development of “learned helplessness”. Because respondent did not offer any contrary proof, the determination that a customized power wheelchair is not medically necessary is not supported by substantial evidence (see, Social Services Law § 365-a; Matter of Gartz v Wing, 236 AD2d 890; Matter of Dobson v Perales, 175 AD2d 628). We therefore annul the determination and grant the petition. (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D.2d 961, 662 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starkweather-v-wing-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack