Starkweather v. Eddy
This text of 120 Cal. App. 121 (Starkweather v. Eddy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff and respondent moved to dismiss the appeal in the instant case upon the ground that [122]*122the same was not pursued in this court within the time prescribed by law.
Nothing more than the filing and serving of a notice of appeal appears to have been accomplished prior to expiration of the time for ordering a transcript. The motion to dismiss is not resisted, and since it falls squarely within the purview of General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Holman, 63 Cal. App. 17 [217 Pac. 1086], said motion should be granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
Works, P. J., and Friclce, J., pro tern., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 Cal. App. 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starkweather-v-eddy-calctapp-1932.