Starks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Starks v. State

637 So. 2d 371, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5305

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Starks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 627 So. 2d 1194 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 1, 1994·No. Nos. 92-02820, 92-02832, 92-02825 and 92-02835·Published

Opinion

FULMER, Judge.

The defendant contends, and the state agrees, that the written sentence, which correctly designated the defendant as a habitual offender on the felony convictions for which he was being sentenced, erroneously included a habitual offender designation on the misdemeanor conviction.

Reversed and remanded with directions to correct the scrivener’s error by deleting the habitual offender designation on the defendant’s sentence for the misdemeanor of resisting a merchant in violation of section 812.015(6), Florida Statutes (1991).

HALL, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FULMER, Judge.

The defendant contends, and the state agrees, that the written sentence, which correctly designated the defendant as a habitual offender on the felony convictions for which he was being sentenced, erroneously included a habitual offender designation on the misdemeanor conviction.

Reversed and remanded with directions to correct the scrivener’s error by deleting the habitual offender designation on the defendant’s sentence for the misdemeanor of resisting a merchant in violation of section 812.015(6), Florida Statutes (1991).

HALL, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., concur.

Starks v. State, 637 So. 2d 371, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5305 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

637 So. 2d 371 (Starks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.