Starks v. State

137 Ala. 9
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1902·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

HAKALSON, J.

A proper predicate for the admission of the dying declarations of the deceased was laid, and there was no error in their admission in evidence. The. statements made, at the time, by the deceased, as called for by the State, were a part of the res gestae of the homicide, and were properly admitted as incident to what was done, as shedding light on the main fact.— Johnson v. State, 102 Ala. 1, 15;McQueen v. State. 103 Ala, 12; 6 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law (1st ed.), 123; 21 Ib. 99, 101-2.

The charge requested by the defendants wa,s properly refused. — Thomas v. State, 130 Ala. 62; Evans v. State, 109 Ala. 13; Jolly v. State, 94 Ala. 19.

These were the only exceptions reserved.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Starks v. State, 137 Ala. 9 (Ala. 1902).

137 Ala. 9 (Starks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sales v. State
435 So. 2d 242 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1983)
Guntharp v. State
308 So. 2d 722 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1974)
Lang v. State
122 So. 2d 526 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1959)
Commonwealth v. Harris
41 A.2d 688 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1945)