Starks v. Lusk

216 S.W. 1119, 280 Mo. 268, 1919 Mo. LEXIS 202
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedDecember 22, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 216 S.W. 1119 (Starks v. Lusk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Starks v. Lusk, 216 S.W. 1119, 280 Mo. 268, 1919 Mo. LEXIS 202 (Mo. 1919).

Opinion

BOND, C. J.

This case is fully stated and elaborately discussed in the majority and dissenting opinions of the Springfield Court of Appeals (187:'S. W. 586 et seq).

After a careful examination of the facts as shown in the record, we are satisfied that a correct conclusion was reached in the majority opinion. We therefore approve the majority opinion of the Springfield Court of Appeals.

The judgment of the circuit court is, therefore, affirmed. It is._ so ordered.

All concur, except Goode and Graves, JJ., who dissent; Woodson, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad
595 S.W.2d 41 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1980)
Henkrick v. Kurn
179 S.W.2d 717 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1944)
Moffatt v. Link
229 S.W. 836 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1921)
Bailey v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
224 S.W. 837 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 S.W. 1119, 280 Mo. 268, 1919 Mo. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starks-v-lusk-mo-1919.