Starks v. HOSPITAL SERVICE PLAN OF NJ
This text of 453 A.2d 159 (Starks v. HOSPITAL SERVICE PLAN OF NJ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ALICE STARKS, AN INDIVIDUAL; JULIUS KAY, AN INDIVIDUAL; BARBARA ROCAFUERTE, AN INDIVIDUAL; UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 464, AFL-CIO, AMALGAMATED WELFARE FUND, A TRUST; AND ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE MEMBERS OF THE CLASS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
HOSPITAL SERVICE PLAN OF N.J., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION; AND MEDICAL-SURGICAL PLAN OF N.J., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Richard L. Plotkin argued the cause for appellants (Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch and Vanderbilt & Siegel, attorneys; Richard L. Plotkin and Jeri E. Ruscoll, on the briefs).
Harold Krieger argued the cause for respondents (Krieger, Ferrara, Feinsilver, Flynn and Catalina, attorneys; Harold Krieger and Joseph J. Ferrara, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division reported at 182 N.J. Super. 342 (1981).
For affirmance Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK and O'HERN 6.
For reversal none.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
453 A.2d 159, 91 N.J. 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starks-v-hospital-service-plan-of-nj-nj-1982.