Starkie Holding Corp. v. Board of Education

248 A.D. 573

Opinion

Orders granting defendants’ motions for judgment dismissing the complaint under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that it is legally insufficient, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously reversed, with costs, and the motions denied, on the authority of Williams v. City of New York (118 App. Div. 756; affd., 192 N. Y. 541); Clarke Co. v. Board of Education (156 App. Div. 842; affd., 215 N. Y. 646); People ex rel. Carlin Construction Co. v. Prendergast (220 id. 725). Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Starkie Holding Corp. v. Board of Education, 248 A.D. 573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 573 (Starkie Holding Corp. v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

T.A. Clarke Co. v. . Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York
109 N.E. 1093 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Williams v. . City of New York
84 N.E. 1123 (New York Court of Appeals, 1908)
Williams v. City of New York
118 A.D. 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
T. A. Clarke Co. v. Board of Education
156 A.D. 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)