Starkey's v. . McClure

Superior Court of North Carolina

Starkey's v. . McClure

1 N.C. 83

DecidedMarch 5, 1797

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 83 (Starkey's v. . McClure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Starkey's v. . McClure, 1 N.C. 83 (N.C. Ct. App. 1797).

Pincite

Opinion

One of those persons, who had taken a lot of slaves under this division but who was no party to this suit, was introduced on the part of the plaintiffs, to show that such a division by consent had been made.

The defendant's counsel objected to that person being sworn, on the ground of interest, and on argument, NOTE. — See Ferrel v. Perry, ante, 25, and the cases referred to in Farrell v. Perry, 2 N.C. 2; and also Kaywood v. Barnett, 20 N.C. 88.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

One of those persons, who had taken a lot of slaves under this division but who was no party to this suit, was introduced on the part of the plaintiffs, to show that such a division by consent had been made.

The defendant's counsel objected to that person being sworn, on the ground of interest, and on argument, NOTE. — See Ferrel v. Perry, ante, 25, and the cases referred to in Farrell v. Perry, 2 N.C. 2; and also Kaywood v. Barnett, 20 N.C. 88.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starkeys-v-mcclure-ncsuperct-1797.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack