Starkey's v. . McClure

1 N.C. 83
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided March 5, 1797·Published

Opinion

One of those persons, who had taken a lot of slaves under this division but who was no party to this suit, was introduced on the part of the plaintiffs, to show that such a division by consent had been made.

The defendant's counsel objected to that person being sworn, on the ground of interest, and on argument, NOTE. — See Ferrel v. Perry, ante, 25, and the cases referred to in Farrell v. Perry, 2 N.C. 2; and also Kaywood v. Barnett, 20 N.C. 88.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Starkey's v. . McClure, 1 N.C. 83 (N.C. Ct. App. 1797).

1 N.C. 83 (Starkey's v. . McClure) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kaywood v. . Barnett
20 N.C. 88 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1838)