Starkey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Starkey v. State

456 S.W.3d 505, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 237, 2015 WL 1119453

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 10, 2015·No. ED 101148·Published

Opinion

[506] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Starkey appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ.. P. 84.16(b) (2014).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[506] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Starkey appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ.. P. 84.16(b) (2014).

Starkey v. State, 456 S.W.3d 505, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 237, 2015 WL 1119453 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

456 S.W.3d 505 (Starkey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.