Starkey v. Starkey

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Starkey v. Starkey

2 N.J. Misc. 1123, 1924 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 34

DecidedNovember 25, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.J. Misc. 1123 (Starkey v. Starkey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Starkey v. Starkey, 2 N.J. Misc. 1123, 1924 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 34 (N.J. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Buchanan, V. C.

Petitioner sues for divorce for the cause of desertion. I am entirely satisfied from the evidence that defendant, after a course of cruel and brutal conduct toward his wife, deserted her on or about December 21st, 1921, in New York City, where the matrimonial domicile then was. This gave her the right to change her domicile and acquire a separate domicile of her own. Wallace v. Wallace, 65 N. J. Eq. 359.

She moved to New Jersey about two' weeks later, and the proof convinces me that she then acquired a bona fide resi deuce and domicile in this state,- which continued down to the filing; of the petition. Meanwhile the husband not only did not terminate the desertion, or attempt reconciliation, but sought her out and committed an atrocious assault and battery upon her (for which he was convicted and is still serving sentence of imprisonment). The separation, which commenced in New York on December 21st, 1921, continued, therefore, of the requisite statutory character, and at the end of two years, on December 21st, 1923, matured into a cause of action under the statute, the petitioner’s cause of action then arose. Koch v. Koch, 79 N. J. Eq. 24; Gordon v. Gordon, 89 N. J. Eq. 535.

She was at that time a resident of this state, and continued SO' to be down to the filing of the petition. This court, therefore, has jurisdiction under the statute. Koch v. Koch, supra.

Petitioner is entitled to decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buchanan, V. C.

Petitioner sues for divorce for the cause of desertion. I am entirely satisfied from the evidence that defendant, after a course of cruel and brutal conduct toward his wife, deserted her on or about December 21st, 1921, in New York City, where the matrimonial domicile then was. This gave her the right to change her domicile and acquire a separate domicile of her own. Wallace v. Wallace, 65 N. J. Eq. 359.

She moved to New Jersey about two' weeks later, and the proof convinces me that she then acquired a bona fide resi deuce and domicile in this state,- which continued down to the filing; of the petition. Meanwhile the husband not only did not terminate the desertion, or attempt reconciliation, but sought her out and committed an atrocious assault and battery upon her (for which he was convicted and is still serving sentence of imprisonment). The separation, which commenced in New York on December 21st, 1921, continued, therefore, of the requisite statutory character, and at the end of two years, on December 21st, 1923, matured into a cause of action under the statute, the petitioner’s cause of action then arose. Koch v. Koch, 79 N. J. Eq. 24; Gordon v. Gordon, 89 N. J. Eq. 535.

She was at that time a resident of this state, and continued SO' to be down to the filing of the petition. This court, therefore, has jurisdiction under the statute. Koch v. Koch, supra.

Petitioner is entitled to decree.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.J. Misc. 1123, 1924 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starkey-v-starkey-njch-1924.