Starkey v. Harvey
This text of 95 A.2d 140 (Starkey v. Harvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is governed by Dame v. Company, 95 N. H. 125, and Vidal v. Errol, 86 N. H. 585. The right to take depositions is a right granted by statute. R. L., c. 393. Where this statute is silent on questions of procedure and precedences in the taking of depositions, it has long been recognized that the Trial Court has authority, in relation to cases pending before it, to make such orders as justice may require. LaCoss v. Lebanon, 78 N. H. 413, 417, and cases cited. Neither the fact that the plaintiff was the first party to give notice of the taking of depositions nor the pendency of the defendant’s petition to enjoin the taking of his own deposition indicate any abuse of discretion in the Trial Court’s denial of the plaintiff’s petition and the order is
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 A.2d 140, 98 N.H. 96, 1953 N.H. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starkey-v-harvey-nh-1953.