Starkey v. Harvey

95 A.2d 140, 98 N.H. 96, 1953 N.H. LEXIS 22
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedMarch 3, 1953
Docket4167
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 A.2d 140 (Starkey v. Harvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Starkey v. Harvey, 95 A.2d 140, 98 N.H. 96, 1953 N.H. LEXIS 22 (N.H. 1953).

Opinion

Per curiam.

This case is governed by Dame v. Company, 95 N. H. 125, and Vidal v. Errol, 86 N. H. 585. The right to take depositions is a right granted by statute. R. L., c. 393. Where this statute is silent on questions of procedure and precedences in the taking of depositions, it has long been recognized that the Trial Court has authority, in relation to cases pending before it, to make such orders as justice may require. LaCoss v. Lebanon, 78 N. H. 413, 417, and cases cited. Neither the fact that the plaintiff was the first party to give notice of the taking of depositions nor the pendency of the defendant’s petition to enjoin the taking of his own deposition indicate any abuse of discretion in the Trial Court’s denial of the plaintiff’s petition and the order is

Exception overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sands
467 A.2d 202 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A.2d 140, 98 N.H. 96, 1953 N.H. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starkey-v-harvey-nh-1953.