Starker v. Trump Village Section 4, Inc.

104 A.D.3d 937, 960 N.Y.S.2d 912

This text of 104 A.D.3d 937 (Starker v. Trump Village Section 4, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Starker v. Trump Village Section 4, Inc., 104 A.D.3d 937, 960 N.Y.S.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Saitta, J.), dated December 2, 2010, which granted the motion of the defendants New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal and Commissioner of New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, without prejudice to the plaintiff commencing a claim in the Court of Claims.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Claims for damages against state agencies, officers, and [938]*938departments in their official capacity, where the matter is, in reality, one against the State, i.e., where the State is the real party in interest, can be prosecuted only in the Court of Claims (see Morell v Balasubramanian, 70 NY2d 297, 300 [1987]; Power Cooling v State Univ. of N.Y., 284 AD2d 317 [2001]; Automated Ticket Sys. v Quinn, 90 AD2d 738, 739 [1982]). Here, the Supreme Court properly directed dismissal of the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendants New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal and Commissioner of New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal without prejudice to the plaintiff commencing a claim in the Court of Claims.

Moreover, under the circumstances presented, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s request that the matter be transferred to the Court of Claims pursuant to CPLR 325 (a) instead of being dismissed without prejudice. Balkin, J.E, Chambers, Roman and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morell v. Balasubramanian
514 N.E.2d 1101 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Automated Ticket Systems, Ltd. v. Quinn
90 A.D.2d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Power Cooling Inc. v. State
284 A.D.2d 317 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 A.D.3d 937, 960 N.Y.S.2d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starker-v-trump-village-section-4-inc-nyappdiv-2013.