Starke v. State

104 S.E. 918, 25 Ga. App. 766, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 201
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 9, 1920
Docket11757
StatusPublished

This text of 104 S.E. 918 (Starke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Starke v. State, 104 S.E. 918, 25 Ga. App. 766, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 201 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The record in this case contains no evidence authorizing the defendant’s conviction, and the court erred in ■ overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Emmett Houser, for plaintiff in error. Robert E. Brown, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 S.E. 918, 25 Ga. App. 766, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starke-v-state-gactapp-1920.