Starke v. Rodriguez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Starke v. Rodriguez

653 So. 2d 1144, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4638, 1995 WL 254367

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 3, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2419

StatusPublished

This text of 653 So. 2d 1144 (Starke v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Starke v. Rodriguez, 653 So. 2d 1144, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4638, 1995 WL 254367 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order below denying the motion to quash service and the consequent default are reversed because the record affirmatively demonstrates that the defendant appellant has never been properly served with process in this case. Johnston v. Halliday, 516 So.2d 84 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Milanes v. Colonial Penn Ins. Co., 507 So.2d 777 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Gonzalez v. Totalbank, 472 So.2d 861 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order below denying the motion to quash service and the consequent default are reversed because the record affirmatively demonstrates that the defendant appellant has never been properly served with process in this case. Johnston v. Halliday, 516 So.2d 84 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Milanes v. Colonial Penn Ins. Co., 507 So.2d 777 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Gonzalez v. Totalbank, 472 So.2d 861 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

653 So. 2d 1144, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4638, 1995 WL 254367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starke-v-rodriguez-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack