Stark v. White

208 F.2d 848, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 241
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 7, 1954
Docket11456
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 208 F.2d 848 (Stark v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stark v. White, 208 F.2d 848, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 241 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, sued in the District Court complaining that defendant, a surgeon, negligently and carelessly diagnosed the wife’s condition, and thereafter performed an operation upon the plaintiff wife in a negligent and careless manner. At the close of the plaintiffs’ case, the trial judge directed a verdict for the defendant on the ground that there was no evidence to show that defendant had failed to exercise that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by a surgeon in this locality.

Upon review of the claims of the parties and after careful consideration, we are impelled to agreement with the action taken in the District Court. See Rodgers v. Lawson, 1948, 83 U.S.App.D. C. 281, 170 F.2d 157, and cases there cited. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 F.2d 848, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stark-v-white-cadc-1954.