Stark v. Molod Spitz DeSantis & Stark, P.C.

857 N.E.2d 1126, 7 N.Y.3d 856, 824 N.Y.S.2d 595, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 3246
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 17, 2006
StatusPublished

This text of 857 N.E.2d 1126 (Stark v. Molod Spitz DeSantis & Stark, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stark v. Molod Spitz DeSantis & Stark, P.C., 857 N.E.2d 1126, 7 N.Y.3d 856, 824 N.Y.S.2d 595, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 3246 (N.Y. 2006).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that denied appellants’ motion to compel arbitration and granted respondent’s motion to stay arbitration, granted; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine an action or proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
857 N.E.2d 1126, 7 N.Y.3d 856, 824 N.Y.S.2d 595, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 3246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stark-v-molod-spitz-desantis-stark-pc-ny-2006.