Stark v. Jenkins

1 Wash. Terr. 421
CourtWashington Territory
DecidedJuly 15, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 Wash. Terr. 421 (Stark v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Territory primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stark v. Jenkins, 1 Wash. Terr. 421 (Wash. Super. Ct. 1874).

Opinion

Opinion by

Greene, Associate Justice.

Tbe provision of our law that error be taken within three months after the close of the term, in which judgment was rendered, is in the interest of the commonwealth, that there be an end of litigation and is mandatory on the courts.

At the expiration of the time limited the cause of action, trcmsit i/n rem judicatam, and no consent of parties nor willingness of judges can recall a controversy thus wisely, by limitation-of our law, passed into the realm of ended suits.

Motion sustained.

Lewis, Justice, dissented, resting his opinion upon the peculiar circumstances of the case, which were as follows:

The cause had, by an order of the court, been continued from the previous term and the parties ordered to file written briefs, which order had been complied with.

[422]*422And upon the first day of the present term, defendant in' error entered a general appearance and moved to dismiss.

Justice Lewis holding that such acts gave-the court jurisdiction of the cause and estopped defendant in error from asking a dismissal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deschenes v. King County
521 P.2d 1181 (Washington Supreme Court, 1974)
Isom v. Olympia Oil & Wood Products Co.
94 P.2d 482 (Washington Supreme Court, 1939)
B. F. Hibbard & Co. v. Morton
52 P.2d 313 (Washington Supreme Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Wash. Terr. 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stark-v-jenkins-washterr-1874.