Stark v. Baltimore Soda Fountain Mfg. Co., Inc

185 F.2d 398
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 16, 1950·No. 6170·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a summary proceeding in bankruptcy instituted by the trustee to obtain possession of a soda fountain which had been repossessed by a claimant within four months of the filing of the petition in bankruptcy., It appeared that the claimant was in actual possession of the property prior to the bankruptcy, that possession thereof had been obtained by means of a judicial proceeding in a state court and that claimant was asserting title in good faith. For reasons adequately stated in the opinion of the court below, we think that the court was without jurisdiction to try in a summary proceeding the questions involved and that, since claimant raised the question of jurisdiction before the entry of final order of the referee, the matter of jurisdiction was not waived by claimant. See Cline v. Kaplan, 323 U.S. 97, 65 S.Ct. 155, 89 L.Ed. 97.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stark v. Baltimore Soda Fountain Mfg. Co., Inc, 185 F.2d 398 (4th Cir. 1950).

185 F.2d 398 (Stark v. Baltimore Soda Fountain Mfg. Co., Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pressler v. Haab
420 F. Supp. 437 (N.D. Indiana, 1976)
In Re Alliance Beverage Co., Inc.
420 F. Supp. 437 (N.D. Indiana, 1976)
In re Spur Fuel Oil Sales Corp.
204 F. Supp. 696 (E.D. New York, 1962)
In re Roger Craig, Inc.
199 F. Supp. 502 (D. Maryland, 1961)
Stark v. Baltimore Soda Fountain Mfg. Co.
101 F. Supp. 842 (D. Maryland, 1952)