Stark County Bar Ass'n. v. Weber

Ohio Supreme Court

Stark County Bar Ass'n. v. Weber

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 13

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 5, 1963

DocketD. D. No. 21

StatusPublished

This text of 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 13 (Stark County Bar Ass'n. v. Weber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stark County Bar Ass'n. v. Weber, 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 13 (Ohio 1963).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Since this court’s order of June 27, 1962, deferring final determination of this cause, the respondent’s conduct has been beyond reproach, and, it appearing further that respondent has paid the costs and that there is not a likelihood of a repetition of his former conduct, this court is of the opinion that the discipline to be administered should be a public reprimand, and it is so ordered.

Judgment accordingly.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur. Gibson, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Since this court’s order of June 27, 1962, deferring final determination of this cause, the respondent’s conduct has been beyond reproach, and, it appearing further that respondent has paid the costs and that there is not a likelihood of a repetition of his former conduct, this court is of the opinion that the discipline to be administered should be a public reprimand, and it is so ordered.

Judgment accordingly.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur. Gibson, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stark-county-bar-assn-v-weber-ohio-1963.