Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Miller

Ohio Supreme Court

Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Miller

541 N.E.2d 607, 44 Ohio St. 3d 134, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 161

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 26, 1989·No. No. 89-394·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the findings and recommendations of the board. We are particularly concerned with the fraud perpetrated on the trial court by the probating of the revoked will. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended for one year from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We agree with the findings and recommendations of the board. We are particularly concerned with the fraud perpetrated on the trial court by the probating of the revoked will. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended for one year from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Miller, 541 N.E.2d 607, 44 Ohio St. 3d 134, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 161 (Ohio 1989).

Pincite

541 N.E.2d 607 (Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related