Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Leb

718 N.E.2d 1281, 87 Ohio St. 3d 224
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 10, 1999·No. No. 99-1158·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent’s sincere attempts to overcome and treat the substance abuse addiction and mental disorders that contributed to his repeated neglect of client matters and misappropriation of client funds are sufficient to warrant indefinite suspension rather than disbarment. See Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Arnold (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 294, 295-296, 707 N.E.2d 1104, 1105. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio and his reinstatement is conditioned on his making full restitution to the Lehmans and the Largents. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Leb, 718 N.E.2d 1281, 87 Ohio St. 3d 224 (Ohio 1999).

718 N.E.2d 1281 (Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Leb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Leb
1999 Ohio 31 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)