Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Leb

718 N.E.2d 1281, 87 Ohio St. 3d 224
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 10, 1999
DocketNo. 99-1158
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 718 N.E.2d 1281 (Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Leb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Leb, 718 N.E.2d 1281, 87 Ohio St. 3d 224 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent’s sincere attempts to overcome and treat the substance abuse addiction and mental disorders that contributed to his repeated neglect of client matters and misappropriation of client funds are sufficient to warrant indefinite suspension rather than disbarment. See Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Arnold (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 294, 295-296, 707 N.E.2d 1104, 1105. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio and his reinstatement is conditioned on his making full restitution to the Lehmans and the Largents. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Leb
1999 Ohio 31 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
718 N.E.2d 1281, 87 Ohio St. 3d 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stark-county-bar-assn-v-leb-ohio-1999.