Stark County Bar Ass'n v. George
This text of 344 N.E.2d 132 (Stark County Bar Ass'n v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Prom án anlaysis of the evidence, this court agrees that the record amply, supports the findings of the board that respondent has violated DR 1-102 (A) (4), (5) and (6), DR 2-107, DR 3-101, DR 3-102, and DR 3-103 of the Code of Professional Responsibility.
The foregoing violations, individually and' collectively,'constitute misconduct as defined in Gov. R. V (5) (a).
We come now to the recommendation of the board that respondent.be indefinitely suspended; from the practice of law.'
We find that respondent’s conduct showed hé was dishonest, fraudulent, deceitful, and that, he misrepresented material facts in the proceedings involving his bankruptcy and in'his dealings with the, Wilsons; that such "conduct was prejudicial to the administration of justice'; and that snch conduct reflects on his fitness to practice law.
We further1 find .that he aided a nonTÍáwyer, his brother, in the unauthorized practice of law.
In view of the foregoing, it is the judgment of this court, pursuant to Gov. R. V(6) (a), that respondent, Lyn C. George, be permanently disbarred from the practice of law. '
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
344 N.E.2d 132, 45 Ohio St. 2d 267, 74 Ohio Op. 2d 425, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stark-county-bar-assn-v-george-ohio-1976.