Stark County Bar Ass'n v. DePasquale

655 N.E.2d 730, 74 Ohio St. 3d 6
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 25, 1995
DocketNo. 95-1192
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 655 N.E.2d 730 (Stark County Bar Ass'n v. DePasquale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stark County Bar Ass'n v. DePasquale, 655 N.E.2d 730, 74 Ohio St. 3d 6 (Ohio 1995).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommended sanction. Respondent is, therefore, suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year; however, this suspension period is suspended and he is placed on a two-year probation period, provided that during this period no disciplinary complaints against respondent are certified to the board by a probable cause panel and that respondent meets regularly with an attorney appointed by relator to supervise his compliance with the Disciplinary Rules. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Wright and Cook, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Kendrick
2016 Ohio 5600 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)
Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. DePasquale
1995 Ohio 271 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
655 N.E.2d 730, 74 Ohio St. 3d 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stark-county-bar-assn-v-depasquale-ohio-1995.