Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Beyoglides
This text of 169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 201 (Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Beyoglides) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In view of statements in the opinion in State v. Morello, post, 213, to the effect that scienter need not be proved in order to sustain a conviction for selling intoxicants to a minor, some doubt has been expressed by some members of the court as to whether conviction of the offense of selling intoxicants to a minor shows moral turpitude in the instant case. However, since the court is of the opinion that a substantial number of the findings of the board on the other charges are sufficient to support the recommendation of the board, we do not find it necessary to pass on that question at this time.
The objections to the findings and recommendation of the board are overruled, the report of the board is confirmed, and judgment is rendered accordingly.
Report confirmed, and judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stark-county-bar-assn-v-beyoglides-ohio-1959.