Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Beyoglides

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 201
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 6, 1959
DocketD. D. No. 9
StatusPublished

This text of 169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 201 (Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Beyoglides) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Beyoglides, 169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 201 (Ohio 1959).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In view of statements in the opinion in State v. Morello, post, 213, to the effect that scienter need not be proved in order to sustain a conviction for selling intoxicants to a minor, some doubt has been expressed by some members of the court as to whether conviction of the offense of selling intoxicants to a minor shows moral turpitude in the instant case. However, since the court is of the opinion that a substantial number of the findings of the board on the other charges are sufficient to support the recommendation of the board, we do not find it necessary to pass on that question at this time.

The objections to the findings and recommendation of the board are overruled, the report of the board is confirmed, and judgment is rendered accordingly.

Report confirmed, and judgment accordingly.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Bell and Herbert, JJ., concur. Peck, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stark-county-bar-assn-v-beyoglides-ohio-1959.