MACK, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to the provisions of section 3850 of the Revised Code of Montana, the material portions of which are copied in the margin,1 action was brought by plaintiff corporation against the directors of a South Dakota corporation doing business in Montana, to subject them to a Montana judgment recovered by plaintiff against the corporation. To the declaration, which alleged the failure of the corporation to file the required report within the statutory period and of defendants to file the required affidavit, a demurrer was sustained.
[1] 1. Under the decisions of Helena Power-Transmission Co. v. Spratt, 35 Mont. 108, 88 Pac. 773, 8 L. R. A. (N. S.) 567, 10 Ann. Cas. 1055, and Daily v. Marshall, 47 Mont. 377, 133 Pac. 681, and [423]*423notwithstanding Nelson v. Bank, 157 Fed. 161, 84 C. C. A. 609, 13 Ann. Cas. 811, we are satisfied that this statute was not intended to and does not apply to foreign corporations.
[2, 3] 2. At the oral argument, counsel properly conceded that, if the statute applied to foreign corporations, “the debt or judgment” specified in the statute must be limited to a debt incurred in Montana or a judgment based thereon; otherwise, the act would'be clearly unconstitutional, as Montana is without power to make Illinois directors of a South Dakota corporation liable upon a debt incurred in Missouri to a Missouri corporation.' That the judgment was rendered in Montana raises no presumption that the debt was there incurred. Proof of this fact would be essential; the fact itself must therefore be alleged in the declaration. Bartlett v. Crozier, 17 Johns. (N. Y.) 439, 8 Am. Dec. 428.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI