Stardevant v. Wainwright

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stardevant v. Wainwright

209 So. 2d 485, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5654

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 18, 1968

DocketNo. J-498

StatusPublished

This text of 209 So. 2d 485 (Stardevant v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stardevant v. Wainwright, 209 So. 2d 485, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5654 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By his petition for Habeas Corpus Ronald Stardevant alleged that he was being illegally restrained of his liberty by Louie L. Wainwright, Director of the Division of Corrections. This Court issued rule nisi to which the respondent has now filed his return demonstrating that he has petitioner in lawful custody.

Therefore, the rule nisi is discharged.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By his petition for Habeas Corpus Ronald Stardevant alleged that he was being illegally restrained of his liberty by Louie L. Wainwright, Director of the Division of Corrections. This Court issued rule nisi to which the respondent has now filed his return demonstrating that he has petitioner in lawful custody.

Therefore, the rule nisi is discharged.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ. concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 So. 2d 485, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stardevant-v-wainwright-fladistctapp-1968.