Starbody v. Ceco Steel Products Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida

Starbody v. Ceco Steel Products Corp.

176 So. 2d 335, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3191

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 9, 1965

DocketNo. 34072

StatusPublished

This text of 176 So. 2d 335 (Starbody v. Ceco Steel Products Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Starbody v. Ceco Steel Products Corp., 176 So. 2d 335, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3191 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 21, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 21, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 So. 2d 335, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starbody-v-ceco-steel-products-corp-fla-1965.