Star Lite Merchandise Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Star Lite Merchandise Co. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 1007, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2830

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 29, 1968

DocketNo. P68/96; protests 65/8850, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 1007 (Star Lite Merchandise Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Star Lite Merchandise Co. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1007, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2830 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of earphones similar in all material respects to those the subject of Motorola, Inc., and International Expediters, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 303, Abstract 69019) and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of earphones which are not suitable for controlling, distributing, modifying, producing, or rectifying electrical energy and that said merchandise, in fact, consists of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, wholly or in chief value of metal, and are not dedicated to use with radios, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of earphones similar in all material respects to those the subject of Motorola, Inc., and International Expediters, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 303, Abstract 69019) and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of earphones which are not suitable for controlling, distributing, modifying, producing, or rectifying electrical energy and that said merchandise, in fact, consists of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, wholly or in chief value of metal, and are not dedicated to use with radios, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 Cust. Ct. 1007, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/star-lite-merchandise-co-v-united-states-cusc-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack