Star Co v. Wheeler Syndicate, Inc.

91 Misc. 640, 155 N.Y.S. 782
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 91 Misc. 640 (Star Co v. Wheeler Syndicate, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Star Co v. Wheeler Syndicate, Inc., 91 Misc. 640, 155 N.Y.S. 782 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1915).

Opinion

Weeks, J.

The plaintiff seeks an injunction restraining the defendant from using the words ‘ ‘ Mutt [641]*641and Jeff ” in connection with cartoons designated as ‘ comic strips, ’ ’ which are claimed to constitute comic sections of newspapers. It is asserted that such words used as a title constitute a trade mark or trade name, ownership of which is claimed by the Star Company and also by the artist Harry C. Fisher, under license from whom the Wheeler Syndicate, Inc., claims the exclusive right to use the same. The Star Company also asserts the right to prevent any person, without its consent, from depicting the figures of either Mutt ’ ’ or “ Jeff ” in comic strips, or making any sketches or representations of said characters, or using said names as designations of the comic characters or figures of “ Mutt ” or “ Jeff.”

The grotesque figure of Mutt ” first appeared in a cartoon drawn by Fisher which appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle on November 15, 1907, and the figure continued to appear in his cartoons in that newspaper until December 10, 1907, on which day the cartoon was copyrighted by Fisher. On the following day a similar cartoon, also containing the figure of Mutt ” and drawn by Fisher, appeared in the San Francisco Examiner, and such cartoon was also copyrighted by Fisher. On May 5, 1908, another grotesque figure called “ Jeff ” was introduced by Fisher in the cartoon appearing on that day in the Examiner. Until May, 1909, Fisher continued to draw cartoons of ‘ Mutt ’ ’ and ‘ ‘ Jeff, ’ ’ containing one or both figures, and the Examiner printed them with the name of the artist following the title or caption of the picture. In this month (May, 1909) Fisher’s cartoons of Mutt ” and Jeff ” first appeared in the New York American, published by this plaintiff.

On August 8,1910, Fisher entered into an agreement with the plaintiff for a period of five years “ to devoté his entire time, attention and energy to the Star Corn[642]*642pany- and the publications and newspaper enterprises in which Mr. William E. Hearst is or may be interested, and to work exclusively for the Star Company and such publications and newspaper enterprises.” The Star Company, in addition to allowing Fisher to appear in vaudeville, agreed that during the life of the agreement “no one, with its consent, shall produce Mutt ’ or ‘ Jeff ’ or any other series originated by Mr. Fisher in any publication controlled by the Star Company or Mr. Hearst, and that it will prohibit any such publication on due notification from Mr. Fisher. ’ ’

On September 22, 1910, Fisher copyrighted in book form some of the cartoons which had been theretofore published in various newspapers, together with some new ones, under the title “ The Mutt and Jeff Cartoons, by Bud Fisher." A second book under the same name and designated “ Book 2 ” was copyrighted by Fisher on November 1,1911.

On November 14, 1914, Fisher applied for registration of the title “ Mutt and Jeff ” as a trade mark for a series of cartoons, and registration was- granted March 9, 1915.'

Prior to December 11, 1914, the cartoons had invariably been published under the descriptive captions or titles as furnished by the artist with his drawings and with the words ‘ ‘ By Bud Fisher ’ ’ added to such titles. Up to that time the words “ Mutt and Jeff ” had never been used in the newspapers as a title.

The plaintiff, having learned that its contract with Fisher would not be renewed, prefixed to the descriptive title of the cartoon as published in the New York American on December 11, 1914, the words “ Mutt and Jeff,” but did not prefix those words to the title of the cartoon as published under its syndicated service in the newspapers outside of New York city.

After that date the words “ Mutt and Jeff ” were [643]*643not again used as a title until January 19, 1915, when the cartoon was published under the title “Mutt and Jeff. By Bud Fisher,’’ and this style of publication continued until January 29, 1915.

The cartoons in question, which are called comic strips, ’ ’ may be described from the exhibits as a series of five or six pictures arranged in a strip so as to cover the width of a newspaper page, and depicting the progressive development of a situation in which the oversized “ Mutt ” and the undersized “ Jeff ” are usually the only participants and in which the latter is usually the subject of maltreatment by the former.

“ Syndicating,” referred to in the papers upon this motion as a business in which both .the Star Company and the Wheeler Syndicate, Inc., are engaged, consists in gathering materials suitable for newspaper publication from writers and artists and distributing the same at regular intervals, in the form of matrices, to newspapers throughout the country for publication on the same day.

The plaintiff rests its claim upon the authority of New York Herald Co. v. Star Co., 146 Fed. Repr. 204, which sustained the Herald’s right to a trade mark in the words ‘ ‘ Buster Brown ” as a title or heading for a comic section of a newspaper. It was stated in that case that a comic section might consist of several pages or of a single page, or that it might be a subsection of a larger section, also comic, and that the artist who originated or drew the first figure of Buster Brown,” or any other person, was entirely free to design, draw, color and publish comic pictures of the same kind as those to which the title had been prefixed by the owner of the trade mark, provided the cartoons did not so closely imitate pictures already published as to amount to an infringement thereof. The opinion points out that the Buster Brown” case concerned only an [644]*644alleged infringement of a trade mark, and presented no question as to copyright or as to unfair competition. In these last two respects, as well as in its facts, the case is wholly dissimilar to the case at bar.

In the “ Buster Brown ” case the comic figure had never been used for a newspaper cartoon or comic section prior to its use in the comic section or supplement of the Herald; neither the name nor the figure had been used by the artist theretofore, except for an advertising poster; the cartoon which was drawn in black and white by the artist Outcalt had been colored by the art department of the Herald for such publication ; the application of the title to the page or section was originally made by the Herald and was continuously used as a heading for such section for more than three years, and such title had become widely known as a distinguishing mark of the comic section issued by the Herald Company, and had been syndicated by it under that name as a comic section, and such title had been registered by the Herald Company as a trade mark.

In the present case there has been no such original" application by the Star Company of the title “ Mutt and Jeff ” to the pictures described as “ comic strips,” and no such continued and exclusive appropriation of the title to such purpose is shown. It does not appear that the cartoons have been published as a section or part of a comic supplement, or that the title has become known as a distinguishing mark of any such supplement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Hartford v. Associated Construction Co.
384 A.2d 390 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1978)
Parsons Trading Co. v. Hoffman
107 Misc. 536 (New York Supreme Court, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 Misc. 640, 155 N.Y.S. 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/star-co-v-wheeler-syndicate-inc-nysupct-1915.