Stappenbeck v. Sitter

280 A.D.2d 908, 720 N.Y.S.2d 857, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1288
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court’s “determination regarding custody * * * based upon a first-hand assessment of the credibility of the witnesses after an evidentiary hearing, is entitled to great weight and will not be set aside unless it lacks an evidentiary basis in the record” (Matter of Samuel L. J. v Sherry H., 206 AD2d 886, lv denied 84 NY2d 810). The record supports the court’s determination that the best interests of the children would be served by continuing joint custody (see, Matter of Meres v Botsch, 260 AD2d 757, 758) and that the primary residence of the children shall be with petitioner. (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Miles, J.H.O. — Custody.) Present — Green, J. P., Wisner, Scudder, Burns and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stappenbeck v. Sitter, 280 A.D.2d 908, 720 N.Y.S.2d 857, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1288 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

280 A.D.2d 908 (Stappenbeck v. Sitter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re F.P. v. Sammie H.
305 A.D.2d 1050 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Eamer v. Keller
283 A.D.2d 981 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)