Stappenbeck v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
This text of 832 So. 2d 945 (Stappenbeck v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the final order disqualifying the appellant from receiving unemployment benefits where there is substantial, competent record evidence to support the determination that he failed to follow the reasonable instructions of his employer, and was thus discharged for misconduct as defined by section 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2001). See Bozzo v. Safelite Glass Corp., 654 So.2d 1042, 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Brownstein v. Hartwell Enters., Inc., 647 So.2d 1004, 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Rubido v. Brinks, Inc., 601 So.2d 1298, 1300 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
832 So. 2d 945, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19173, 2002 WL 31870529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stappenbeck-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2002.