Stappenbeck v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

832 So. 2d 945, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19173, 2002 WL 31870529
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 26, 2002
DocketNo. 3D02-663
StatusPublished

This text of 832 So. 2d 945 (Stappenbeck v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stappenbeck v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 832 So. 2d 945, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19173, 2002 WL 31870529 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final order disqualifying the appellant from receiving unemployment benefits where there is substantial, competent record evidence to support the determination that he failed to follow the reasonable instructions of his employer, and was thus discharged for misconduct as defined by section 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2001). See Bozzo v. Safelite Glass Corp., 654 So.2d 1042, 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Brownstein v. Hartwell Enters., Inc., 647 So.2d 1004, 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Rubido v. Brinks, Inc., 601 So.2d 1298, 1300 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brownstein v. Hartwell Enterprises, Inc.
647 So. 2d 1004 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Bozzo v. SAFELITE GLASS CORPORATION
654 So. 2d 1042 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Rubido v. Brinks, Inc.
601 So. 2d 1298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
832 So. 2d 945, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19173, 2002 WL 31870529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stappenbeck-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2002.