Stapleton v. Monroe

Supreme Court of Georgia

Stapleton v. Monroe

36 S.E. 428, 111 Ga. 848, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 817

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 8, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 36 S.E. 428 (Stapleton v. Monroe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stapleton v. Monroe, 36 S.E. 428, 111 Ga. 848, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 817 (Ga. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. An absolute and unconditional promissory note can not be so changed by evidence of a contemporaneous parol agreement as to engraft upon it a condition. Civil Code, §3675.

2. If, in the trial of a case; one party introduce immaterial and illegal evidence without objection, the other party is not thereby entitled to introduce, over objection, other illegal evidence in rebuttal. There can be no equation of errors in the trial of a case. Woolfolk v. State, 81 Ga. 552.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Fish, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI