Stapleton v. La Shelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stapleton v. La Shelle

124 A.D. 335, 109 N.Y.S. 42, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2097

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 1908

DocketNo. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 124 A.D. 335 (Stapleton v. La Shelle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stapleton v. La Shelle, 124 A.D. 335, 109 N.Y.S. 42, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2097 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Ingraham, J.:

This is an appeal from an order similar to the order in the case under the same title decided herewith., (124 App. Div. 333.) For the reasons stated in that opinion the order appealed from, is affirmed, without prejudice to an application by the defendant to the Speecial Term for leave; to issue á new commission to orally cross-examine the witness if it should appear after an examination of the testimony as taken in the commission returned that such cross-examination is necessary, with no costs of this appeal.

Patterson, P. J., Laugiilin, Clarke and Houghton, JJ., concurred,

Order affirmed, without prejudice to application, as indicated in opinion. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ingraham, J.:

This is an appeal from an order similar to the order in the case under the same title decided herewith., (124 App. Div. 333.) For the reasons stated in that opinion the order appealed from, is affirmed, without prejudice to an application by the defendant to the Speecial Term for leave; to issue á new commission to orally cross-examine the witness if it should appear after an examination of the testimony as taken in the commission returned that such cross-examination is necessary, with no costs of this appeal.

Patterson, P. J., Laugiilin, Clarke and Houghton, JJ., concurred,

Order affirmed, without prejudice to application, as indicated in opinion. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 A.D. 335, 109 N.Y.S. 42, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stapleton-v-la-shelle-nyappdiv-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack