Stapleton v. Idanks Limited Liability Company
This text of Stapleton v. Idanks Limited Liability Company (Stapleton v. Idanks Limited Liability Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
DAVID P. STAPLETON in his capacity as Civ. No. 6:24-cv-85-MK COURT-APPOINTED RECEIVER for the RECEIVERSHIP ENTITY, including ZADEH KICKS, ORDER
Plaintiff, v.
IDANKS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,
Defendant. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (#35), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, the Court reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). The Court finds no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (#35) is adopted. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (#29) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 25th of September, 2024. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 1 – ORDER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stapleton v. Idanks Limited Liability Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stapleton-v-idanks-limited-liability-company-ord-2024.