Stapleton v. Idanks Limited Liability Company

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided September 25, 2024·No. 6:24-cv-00085·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

DAVID P. STAPLETON in his capacity as Civ. No. 6:24-cv-85-MK COURT-APPOINTED RECEIVER for the RECEIVERSHIP ENTITY, including ZADEH KICKS, ORDER

Plaintiff, v.

IDANKS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,

Defendant. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (#35), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, the Court reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). The Court finds no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (#35) is adopted. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (#29) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 25th of September, 2024. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 1 – ORDER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stapleton v. Idanks Limited Liability Company, (D. Or. 2024).

Stapleton v. Idanks Limited Liability Company (Stapleton v. Idanks Limited Liability Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related