Staples v. State
246 S.W.3d 8, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1675, 2007 WL 4300478
Opinion
ORDER
Isaiah Staples appeals the denial after an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief for ineffective assistance of counsel. After a thor *9 ough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Staples v. State, 246 S.W.3d 8, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1675, 2007 WL 4300478 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
246 S.W.3d 8 (Staples v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Texas Lottery Commission v. First State Bank of DeQueen, Stone Street Capital, Inc. and Cletius L. Irvan
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008