Staples v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Staples v. State

139 S.E. 94, 37 Ga. App. 97, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 486

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 14, 1927

Docket18126

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 139 S.E. 94 (Staples v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Staples v. State, 139 S.E. 94, 37 Ga. App. 97, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 486 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The evidence sustains the conviction of the offense of operating an automobile on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

2. In view of the note of the trial judge, the assignment of error in ground 4 of the motion for new trial is without merit.

3. An objection to the admission of evidence, that it is “irrelevant, immaterial, inadmissible, and prejudicial,” is too general to be considered by this court. See Manning v. State, 33 Ga. App. 610 (9) (127 S. E. 475); Hayes v. State, 36 Ga. App. 669 (137 S. E. 860), and cit. Grounds 5, 6, and 7 of the motion for new trial are controlled by this ruling.

4. Viewing the charge of the court as a whole, no reversible error is shown in any of the criticisms of it in the remaining assignments of error.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Blood%oortli, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI