Staples v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Staples v. State

62 S.E. 95, 4 Ga. App. 649, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 500

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 31, 1908·No. 1233·Published

Opinion

Powell, J.

The defendant was convicted of burglary; and the evidence is ample to sustain -the conviction. Several of the grounds ( of the motion for a new trial, especially those relating to rulings upon testimony, are not stated with that accuracy essential to a review by this court. None of the other exceptions are meritorious; at least none of them present any error of sufficient importance to justify a reversal. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

The defendant was convicted of burglary; and the evidence is ample to sustain -the conviction. Several of the grounds ( of the motion for a new trial, especially those relating to rulings upon testimony, are not stated with that accuracy essential to a review by this court. None of the other exceptions are meritorious; at least none of them present any error of sufficient importance to justify a reversal. Judgment affirmed.

Staples v. State, 62 S.E. 95, 4 Ga. App. 649, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 500 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

62 S.E. 95 (Staples v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.