Staples v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Staples v. State

62 S.E. 95, 4 Ga. App. 649, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 500

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 31, 1908

Docket1233

StatusPublished

This text of 62 S.E. 95 (Staples v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Staples v. State, 62 S.E. 95, 4 Ga. App. 649, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 500 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

The defendant was convicted of burglary; and the evidence is ample to sustain -the conviction. Several of the grounds ( of the motion for a new trial, especially those relating to rulings upon testimony, are not stated with that accuracy essential to a review by this court. None of the other exceptions are meritorious; at least none of them present any error of sufficient importance to justify a reversal. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

The defendant was convicted of burglary; and the evidence is ample to sustain -the conviction. Several of the grounds ( of the motion for a new trial, especially those relating to rulings upon testimony, are not stated with that accuracy essential to a review by this court. None of the other exceptions are meritorious; at least none of them present any error of sufficient importance to justify a reversal. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 S.E. 95, 4 Ga. App. 649, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staples-v-state-gactapp-1908.