Staples v. State

40 S.E. 264, 114 Ga. 256, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 646
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 10, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 40 S.E. 264 (Staples v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Staples v. State, 40 S.E. 264, 114 Ga. 256, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 646 (Ga. 1901).

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. Though an indictment for robbery need not charge that the property alleged to have been forcibly taken from the person of the victim, in fact, belonged to a third person, if it does so charge, it is essential that the State prove the case as laid.

2. Irrespective of other questions presented, a new trial should have been granted because of a fatal variance between the allegata and the probata.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. State
282 S.E.2d 181 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Philpot v. State
196 S.E.2d 358 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Davis v. State
133 S.E.2d 329 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 S.E. 264, 114 Ga. 256, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staples-v-state-ga-1901.