Staples v. State

520 So. 2d 659, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 532, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 613, 1988 WL 12528
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 24, 1988
DocketNo. 87-2169
StatusPublished

This text of 520 So. 2d 659 (Staples v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Staples v. State, 520 So. 2d 659, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 532, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 613, 1988 WL 12528 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant who contends the imposition of costs against him, potentially affecting his gain time, was improper. The state’s response to our order shows the defendant’s offenses oc[660]*660curred prior to July 1, 1985, the effective date of section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985). Accordingly, the assessment of costs against appellant violated the ex post facto clause. State v. Yost, 507 So.2d 1099 (Fla.1987). We reverse and remand with direction that the trial court vacate that part of the sentence which assessed costs against the appellant.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Yost
507 So. 2d 1099 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
520 So. 2d 659, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 532, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 613, 1988 WL 12528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staples-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.