Staples v. State

124 So. 122, 23 Ala. App. 273, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 217
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 25, 1929·No. 7 Div. 559.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

On Rehearing.
Upon a reconsideration of this case, and it appearing that the defendant was misled to his prejudice by the unintentional misstatement of the clerk and sheriff of the court with reference to the subpœnaing and serving of defendant's witnesses, and that defendant was, as a result thereof, deprived of the benefit of material testimony in his behalf, and without fault on his part, this court is of the opinion that the motion for a new trial should have been granted, and that the ends of justice require that this judgment be reversed, and the cause be remanded.

The application for rehearing is granted. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Staples v. State, 124 So. 122, 23 Ala. App. 273, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 217 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

124 So. 122 (Staples v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bradberry v. State
62 So. 2d 802 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1953)
Traffenstedt v. State
38 So. 2d 619 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1949)