Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Staples v. State

Staples v. State

124 So. 122, 23 Ala. App. 273, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 217
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 25, 1929
Docket7 Div. 559.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 124 So. 122 (Staples v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Staples v. State, 124 So. 122, 23 Ala. App. 273, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 217 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinions

On Rehearing.
Upon a reconsideration of this case, and it appearing that the defendant was misled to his prejudice by the unintentional misstatement of the clerk and sheriff of the court with reference to the subpœnaing and serving of defendant's witnesses, and that defendant was, as a result thereof, deprived of the benefit of material testimony in his behalf, and without fault on his part, this court is of the opinion that the motion for a new trial should have been granted, and that the ends of justice require that this judgment be reversed, and the cause be remanded.

The application for rehearing is granted. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradberry v. State
62 So. 2d 802 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1953)
Traffenstedt v. State
38 So. 2d 619 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 So. 122, 23 Ala. App. 273, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staples-v-state-alactapp-1929.