Staples v. Staples

38 A. 497, 20 R.I. 264, 1897 R.I. LEXIS 101
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided October 21, 1897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The testimony shows that the mortgagor has remained in possession of the mortgaged premises for more than twenty years, without the payment of interest, or a recognition by him of the mortgage as an existing obligation. These facts give rise to a presumption that the mortgage has been paid or released. 2 Jones Mort. 4 ed. §§ 1195, 1196. Consistently with this presumption, the respondent, Levi Staples, testifies that his mother, the mortgagee, forgave him the mortgage debt,, and in this he is corroborated by the testimony of his wife, and also of his brother Charles. We think, therefore, that the bill must be dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Staples v. Staples, 38 A. 497, 20 R.I. 264, 1897 R.I. LEXIS 101 (R.I. 1897).

38 A. 497 (Staples v. Staples) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eddy v. Campbell
49 A. 702 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1901)