Staples v. Staples

D.C. Circuit

Staples v. Staples

43 App. D.C. 156, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2585

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 1, 1915

Docket1; No. 2663

StatusPublished

This text of 43 App. D.C. 156 (Staples v. Staples) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Staples v. Staples, 43 App. D.C. 156, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2585 (D.C. Cir. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

It is unnecessary to review the various affidavits in this case, [158]*158some of which purport to set out the evidence submitted on the former hearing. It would serve no useful purpose to recite the contents of these affidavits which are filled with charges of misconduct.

It did not appear to the court below that the newly discovered facts could not have been produced on the former hearing by the exercise of due diligence.

We are unable to perceive anything in the record on which error can be founded, and the decree is affirmed with costs.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI