Staples v. Schulenburg & Boeckeler Lumber Co.

64 N.W. 148, 62 Minn. 158, 1895 Minn. LEXIS 34
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedAugust 6, 1895
DocketNos. 9464-(268)
StatusPublished

This text of 64 N.W. 148 (Staples v. Schulenburg & Boeckeler Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Staples v. Schulenburg & Boeckeler Lumber Co., 64 N.W. 148, 62 Minn. 158, 1895 Minn. LEXIS 34 (Mich. 1895).

Opinion

OOLLINS, J.

There is no merit in the claim made by counsel -for appellant that the deeds of assignment, purporting to have been ■made and delivered under the provisions of the insolvency laws of this state by defendant company to respondent, were not properly executed, and, in form, did not convey to the assignee all of defendant’s property wherever situated. These deeds were regular in form, and complete upon their face. They cannot be attacked and .assailed collaterally, — for instance, in garnishment proceedings instituted against a regularly appointed and duly qualified assignee. Second Nat. Bank v. Schranck, 43 Minn. 38, 44 N. W. 524.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Second National Bank v. Schranck
44 N.W. 524 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 N.W. 148, 62 Minn. 158, 1895 Minn. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staples-v-schulenburg-boeckeler-lumber-co-minn-1895.