Staples v. Arlington State Bank
74 N.W. 1066, 54 Neb. 760, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 160
Opinion
The plaintiffs in error complain in their briefs of only-one ruling of the district court the overruling of an. application for a continuance. No exception was taken to the order complained of and it cannot, therefore, be reviewed. (Coad v. Home Cattle Co., 32 Neb. 761.)
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Staples v. Arlington State Bank, 74 N.W. 1066, 54 Neb. 760, 1898 Neb. LEXIS 160 (Neb. 1898).
74 N.W. 1066 (Staples v. Arlington State Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coad v. Home Cattle Co.
49 N.W. 757 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1891)