Staples Construction Co. v. Florida Industrial Commission

179 So. 2d 346
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 27, 1965
DocketNo. 34475
StatusPublished

This text of 179 So. 2d 346 (Staples Construction Co. v. Florida Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Staples Construction Co. v. Florida Industrial Commission, 179 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May S, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads its to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

The petition of Harley Worthington, respondent, for attorneys’ fees in this Court is denied.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL,. JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 So. 2d 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/staples-construction-co-v-florida-industrial-commission-fla-1965.