Stanyarne v. Chishalm

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 421
CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina
DecidedMay 12, 1749
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 421 (Stanyarne v. Chishalm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanyarne v. Chishalm, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 421 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1749).

Opinion

Upon reading the humble Petition of John Stanyarn and John Martini two of the Executors of the last Will and Testament of James Megget late of St. Helena Planter deceased on behalf of the Minors, praying (for the reasons in their Said Petition contained) to be releivéd against the Management of • one Thomas Chisham who by his intermarriage with Martha Widow and Relict of the Said James Megget and Executrix of his Last Will possessed himself of the whole Estate real and personal of the Said Minors Children of the Said James Megget which was Devised to them by their Said Father’s Will, And upon Motion also made to this Court on behalf of the Petitioners The Court having taken the Same into Consideration have thought fit And So doth Order, That the Said Thomas Chisham and Martha his Wife do return into [422]*422this Court on or before the day by Law appointed for holding the Same in August next, a full true perfect and distinct Account of their and either of their Executorship management and transactions of in and about the Said Orphans Estate, And that they do Shew Cause at the Same day, why they should not give Sufficient Security to this Court for the faithful Administration of the Said Estate to be approved of by the Master of this Court.

Alexr Stewart Deputy Register in Chancery

Upon the humble Petition of Alexander Garden Clerk Rector of the Parish of St. Philips Charles Town and John Guerard of the same place Merchant Guardians of the Person and Estate of David Guerard Gentleman; preferred to this Court, Setting forth, That they have been by various Accidents prevented from carrying into Execution the Order of this Court of the twenty Sixth February 1746, which they obtained upon their humble Petition to this Court, And that they are Advised that the future taking down the roof of the Building to make the Additional Storeys will be attended with an Expence which will be an Absolute Loss to the Said Estate, And that the Estate will be much bettered, if the Said Building was carried on at once to the highth of three Storeys; It was therefore prayed that they might be Authorized and directed to carry on the Said Building mentioned in their Petition to the highth of three Stories and to compleat and finish the Same out of the Monies of the Said David Guerard in their hands and Such other moneys as they may take up on Account of the Said David Guerard on the Securities of the Rents of the Said Buildings for the benefit and Advantage of the Said Estate; Whereupon and on Motion made to this Court on behalf of the Petitioners, the Court hath taken the Same into Consideration, and have thought fit and so doth Order That the Said Petition be referred to the Master of this Court to inquire into the Expence of the proposed Building, and what Moneys the Guardians have in their hands to go on with the Same, and what further Sum it will require to finish the Same, and what will be the Rent of the Said Building when finished, And that he Report the same into this Court without Delay, to the intent, that if the carrying on the said Building shall appear to be for the Benefit of the Said Estate the same may be carryed into Execution without Delay.

On Reading the Petition of David Caw and his Wife Catherine and John Dutarque of the Province aforesaid Executors of the last Will of Noah Serre and also Testamentary Guardian of the Children of the Said Noah Serre, Setting forth amongst other things, That since the Death of the said Noah Serre and the intermarriage of the said Catherine with the said David Caw, Catharine Serre one of the Children of the said Noah Serre hath departed this Life intestate and without issue, by reason whereof the Petitioner David Caw and [423]*423Catharine his Wife in right of the said Catharine are intitled to an equal Share of the personal Estate of the said Catherine Serre deceased with the Brothers and Sisters of the said deceased as they are Severally advised by their Counsel, And that they are willing and desirous to make a just and equal Distribution of the said Catherine Serre’s personal Estate between and among them the said Petitioners and the Brothers and Sisters of the Deceased; It was therefore prayed, That this Court wou’d appoint proper Persons to Divide and Allot to the said David Caw and Catharine his Wife their Share and proportion of the personal Estate of the said Catharine Serre deceased And the said Petitioners having Nominated John Gendron and John Hentie Esquires Mr. Elias Horry Mr. Ralph Jermain Mr. Paul Bruneau and Mr. Alexander Chovin as proper Persons to be by this Court appointed for that purpose; The Court having considered the said Petition Doth Order, That the said John Gendron John Hentie, Elias Horry, Ralph Jermain, Paul Bruneau and Alexandr Chovin, or any four or five of them Do Divide and Allot to the said David Caw and Catharine his Wife their share and proportion of the said Catharine Serre’s personal Estate, And that they do make due Return of their Proceedings therein before the Master of this Court under their respective hands and Seals on or before the day appointed by Law for holding this Court in August next insuing, in order to his Reporting thereon to this Court, To the end that the said Division and Allotment so made and returned, may by this Court be Considered, and if reasonable may be Confirmed and made of Record in the Court, to perpetuate the Memory of the Said Division and Allotment, and for the general Satisfaction of the Parties concerned in the premisses.

Upon the humble Petition, preferred to this Court, of Abraham Waight, Isaac Waight and William Waight Surviving Executors of the last Will and Testament of Isaac Waight Planter deceased, and of William Hext and Mary his Wife, one of the Daughters and Devisees of the said Isaac Waight the Elder in behalf of themselves and Ann Sarah and Jacob Waight Minors Children of the said Isaac Waight the Testator, It is Ordered, for the reasons in the said Petition contained, that it be according to the prayer thereof, But that William Pinckney Esq. Master of this Court be and he is hereby Assigned Guardian of the Persons and Estates of the said Sarah Waight and Jacob Waight Minors until they severally attain their respective ages to the intent that due care be taken to see that Justice is done the Said Minors in the Said Division; And it is further Ordered That John Stanyarn Joseph Stanyarn John Stanyarn Junior John Ladson and Alexander Hext, or any three of four of them do make Division of the personal Estate of the Said Testator in the manner as in and by their Said Petition is prayed among the Petitioners the Testators Children, and that they return an Account thereof before the Master of this Court, [424]*424on or before the 2d Tuesday of July next in order to his Reporting thereon to this Court, That if the Same be approved the Said Division may be finally Confirmed by this Court, and remain of Record in this Court to perpetuate the Memory of the Said Division.

Upon the Petition of the Reverend Mr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanyarne-v-chishalm-ctchansc-1749.